This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 13:03:57 Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:41:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 April 2010 08:02:44 Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > End result is that you have programs depending on libgcc_s even though > > > they do not use exception handling, complicating the deployment to > > > non-glibc systems. > > > > note that libgcc_s isnt there only for exception handling. it provides a > > lot of math functions as well. > > Isn't that all in libgcc? That's what documentation and comments seem > to suggest. the vast majority are in both. look with `readelf -s`. this is the reason for libgcc_s.so linkage in the vast majority of apps in embedded systems (arm/blackfin/mips/superh/etc...). i'm not saying this is related to your issue at hand, just a point of info that libgcc_s !== exception handling. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |