This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Binutils 2.20.1

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Peter Fritzsche <peter dot fritzsche at gmx dot de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:53:33 +0100
Subject: Re: Binutils 2.20.1
References: <8DFF80D4-762A-467B-A2C7-C44AD6FC9D93@adacore.com> <4B434F3D.6040809@ubuntu.com>

On Jan 5, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:

> On 05.01.2010 14:12, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> I (my fault) haven't actively tracked all the patches that are candidate for the release branch but
>> many have been committed and this is time to ask if you want a particular patch to be put in the next
>> minor release.
> 
> a fix for 10144, if available.

Hi,

according to bugzilla, 10144 is still open.

> are any gold updates planned for 2.20.1? For a rebuild test with gold as the default linker I would like to see a fix for 11072 on the branch (objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink is used a lot for package building). Other missing features/options are summarized by Peter Fritzsche in [1].

In addition to Ian reply, I would say that gold would be slightly improved because 2.20 was builded before
a batch of commit.

> is there a chance that the --enable-gold= patch is approved for the trunk and backported to the branch?

The patch is not yet in mainline.

Tristan.

References:
- Binutils 2.20.1
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: Binutils 2.20.1
  - From: Matthias Klose

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]