This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ld -shared -pie revisited

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Mark Lodato <lodatom at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:05:45 -0400
Subject: Re: ld -shared -pie revisited
References: <ca433830910031610g6497e663jb820c32779a3a81c@mail.gmail.com> <20091004000923.GA12799@caradoc.them.org> <ca433830910031729j484f4f46gda29b20635dc7ec5@mail.gmail.com> <20091004035421.GA32271@caradoc.them.org> <ca433830910051644q478af11cw6f15f566ad5de133@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:44:05PM -0400, Mark Lodato wrote:
> Would "gcc -fPIC -pie" not be sufficient?

No, -fPIE makes symbol binding assumptions, but ld -pie enforces them.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- ld -shared -pie revisited
  - From: Mark Lodato
- Re: ld -shared -pie revisited
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: ld -shared -pie revisited
  - From: Mark Lodato
- Re: ld -shared -pie revisited
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: ld -shared -pie revisited
  - From: Mark Lodato

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]