This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [linker] relaxation question
Thank you. I will look into MN10300 port.
Nick Clifton wrote:
Is there any target has adopted the above implementation?
Well the linker relaxation for the MN10300 port is pretty good, so I
would recommend taking a look at that. (You may also want to look at
the effect of the md_allow_eh_opt variable in the gas/ehopt.c file since
you will probably want to set this to 0 for your port).