This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils

From: "rajagopal, dwarak" <dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com>
To: <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:10:52 -0500
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
References: <E7FB0F2BB5FEF242BB2929F02A12B8F337501A@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <6dc9ffc80907060907w1c0b4acejf24695a3cbe472b7@mail.gmail.com>

> 
> Is FMA4 the same as the original FMA in Intel AVX? If yes,
> how different are your assembler/disassembler implementation
> from the one reverted by
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00059.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00286.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00289.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00334.html
> 

Yes. FMA4 is same as original FMA in Intel AVX. The implementations are
similar to the reverted patches.

Thanks,
Dwarak

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: rajagopal, dwarak
- Re: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]