This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Strange binutils-2_16-branch and related tags

Andreas Schwab wrote:
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:

Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> writes:

It seems you are right. Below is the list of all the files which should
not have TAG binutils-2_16-branchpoint. They are just the new files when
comparing TAG binutils-2_16-branchpoint against TAG binutils-2_16. I'll
first try on a local repository mirror next week.

The file binutils/rclex.c is special.  It was previously a generated
file only checked into branches, but appeared later on the trunk as a
non-generated file.  This file should not have that tag either.


Another special file is binutils/po/ro.po, which appeared simultanously
on trunk and binutils-2_16-branch after the branchpoint.

Thanks for point out that. The test result on my local repository mirror looks OK. So I have removed TAG binutils-2_16-branchpoint from the files I listed in my last email plus binutils/rclex.c and binutils/po/ro.po.


Jie

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]