This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: RFC/A: Add a bfd hook for defining common symbols
Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
>> OK, how does this look? Tested in the same way as before.
>
> Better - thanks. You still have a mostly useless bfd * parameter, but I
> guess that there is a theoretical case where it might be needed.
The rule of thumb I'd use in deciding whether to pass a bfd* as the first
arg to a new functions is "If I was writing this in C++, would it be an
ordinary member function of class BFD or a static one?"
cheers,
DaveK