This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: ARM long branch stubs: shared libs
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> This part is correct. The comment is not clear, but the goal is to
> mark undefined weak symbols as dynamic at this point. Branches should
> go to the PLT entry. I'm not sure what happens if you call that PLT
> entry, though, and there is no definition at runtime. Ideally,
> nothing would happen, but I'm sure glibc does not implement that.
Shouldn't it be a really serious runtime failure? Jumping to *ABS* zero
works for me :-)
cheers,
DaveK