This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Lexra support in binutils
- From: Sergey Lapin <slapin at ossfans dot org>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:16:33 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lexra support in binutils
- References: <18644.12578.173615.825412@foo.home> <1221971049-31412-1-git-send-email-slapin@ossfans.org> <20080924234830.GA18684@build.ossfans.org> <20080929142102.GA2524@build.ossfans.org> <20081014210402.GA14255@build.ossfans.org> <48FF414F.2020206@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:05:51PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi, Nick
>
>>> Is there any news regarding Lexra support in binutils?
>
> Did you see Theimo's response to your original patch submission:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00132.html
> & http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00139.html
>
> As well as Adam's ?
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00157.html
Of course, so I have produced this patch based on these suggestions and got no
answer at that time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00165.html
>
> Also, my understanding is that the patches you have submitted are
> against the 2.17 sources. Please could you submit a version generated
> against the current mainline code instead ?
Of course I will but I need advice on that changes (some smaller tips on
what change), since I'm not yet familarized myself with mainline
binutils yet.
>
>> Was there any final conclusion regarding
>> which approach is preferred for MIPS-like CPUs not supporting
>> ISA1 fully?
>
> Lets stick with Maciej's suggestion for now:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2008-09/msg00143.html
>
> Adam has pointed out that this will become cumbersome in the future, but
> we can always have a separate patch to sort that out later on.
All the best,
S.