This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > We have this RPATH_ENVVAR setting in the top-level directory. It breaks > things. For my setup (Linux configurations) it adds some build > directories to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. It breaks system-installed tools when > building a cross-toolchain, because the newly-built BFD library, although > for the same host, has a different target. But for a libtool-based setup > there should be no need to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH or anything like this at > all. This is because libtool has explicit support for running uninstalled > newly-built binaries via the "--mode=execute" option. This option, under > the bonnet, does all the relinking/rpath/whatever hassle is required for > the given platform. All that is required is that .la files are used to > refer to libraries dependent on during the build and libtool. this is what we came to in a previous thread as well: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-07/msg00401.html ive been simply deleting RPATH_ENVVAR in the toplevel configure for Gentoo ... -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |