This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Questions about use of type long in bfd.

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:41:18 +0930
Subject: Re: Questions about use of type long in bfd.
References: <OF0D984626.C7815649-ONC1257359.0029CC4E-C1257359.0029D3D2@onevision.de> <OF631522B7.0ED256D2-ONC1257359.0034C227-C1257359.00351C09@onevision.de>

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:40:05AM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
> In elf64-ppc.c: structure _ppc64_elf_section_data member opd_adjust has 
> type long ?
> 
> Are these point OK for targets, when a 'long' is less than a pointer 
> equaivalent scalar - eg. x86_64-pc-mingw32 ?

The elf64-ppc.c long *opd_adjust is fine until ld manages to remove
over 89 million functions from an executable.  :-)

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions about use of type long in bfd.
  - From: Kai Tietz

References:
- Re: PATCH: PR gas/5035: x86_64-pc-mingw32-as.exe failed to work
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Questions about use of type long in bfd.
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]