This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Rename InvMem to RegMem for x86 assembler
- From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich at novell dot com>
- To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:23:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Rename InvMem to RegMem for x86 assembler
- References: <20070329030948.GA16369@lucon.org>
>>> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> 29.03.07 05:09 >>>
>The usage of InvMem isn't very clear. And we don't need it on sldt,
>smsw and str since their extension_opcode is not None which means
>that their register operand must be encoded in i.rm.regmem anyway.
>This patch rename InvMem to RegMem and remove it from AnyMem.
I have to admit that I find RegMem even more confusing, as that to me
suggests that Reg and Mem are acceptable as operand. What do you
consider unclear with InvMem?
Jan