This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Move SYSV386_COMPAT to config/tc-i386.c

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:33:01 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Move SYSV386_COMPAT to config/tc-i386.c
References: <20070313175042.GA30373@lucon.org> <20070314000024.GG532@bubble.grove.modra.org>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:30:24AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:50:42AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > 	(SystemV386): New.
> > 	(Intel386): Likewise.
> 
> Why ever on earth do you need these?  Please don't add extra opcode
> modifier bits unnecessarily.
> 

I am planning to move i386.h to opcode/i386-opc.c and use bitfields
instead. SYSV386_COMPAT isn't very bitfield friendly.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Move SYSV386_COMPAT to config/tc-i386.c
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- PATCH: Move SYSV386_COMPAT to config/tc-i386.c
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Move SYSV386_COMPAT to config/tc-i386.c
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]