This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: designated initializer vs. long long for i386 assembler

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> > Of course it would be super nice to move the opcode table from
> > include/opcode/i386.h into opcodes/i386-opc.c.
> 
> I can do that. But opcodes/i386-opc.c will be generated from
> a tool compiled with a C99 compiler so that I can use
> designated initializer in opcodes/i386-opc.h.

I would vote strongly against checking this sort of generated file
into CVS.  I think there are other approaches which work just as well.

Ian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]