This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: designated initializer vs. long long for i386 assembler

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>>I need much more than 2 bits, which won't fit in the current
> >>>32bit int.
> >>
> >>Then I suggest adding another field.  I don't think we can force
> >>people to use a C99 compiler to build binutils.
> >
> >Adding another field will lead to massive changes to x86 assembler.
> >I will use long long if C99 feature isn't desirable.
> 
> "long long" _is_ a C99 feature.  GCC had it before of course,
> but not all the world builds binutils using GCC ;-)

long long is used by config/tc-d30v.c and config/tc-xtensa.c.


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]