gas patch: Check TC_EOL_IN_INSN in input-scrub.c

[Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>]

The Blackfin port tries to use TC_EOL_IN_INSN to check for multi-line 
parallel instructions that have one of the following forms:

	R0 = R0 +|- R1 ||
	R1.L = [I0] ||
	NOP;

or
	R0 = R0 +|- R1
	|| R1.L = [I0]
	|| NOP;

Sometimes this fails because we're not looking at a large enough buffer, 
and parts of the insn get cut off.  We've fixed this in our local 
sources with the following patch - is this ok for mainline?  Any 
suggestions for a better approach?


Bernd
	* input-scrub.c (input_scrub_next_buffer): Use TC_EOL_IN_INSN
	in addition to testing for '\n'.

Index: gas/input-scrub.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc3/binutils/binutils-2.17/gas/input-scrub.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -c -p -r1.1 -r1.3
*** gas/input-scrub.c	28 Jun 2006 15:54:14 -0000	1.1
--- gas/input-scrub.c	31 Jul 2006 13:47:25 -0000	1.3
*************** input_scrub_next_buffer (char **bufp)
*** 342,349 ****
    if (limit)
      {
        register char *p;		/* Find last newline.  */
! 
!       for (p = limit - 1; *p != '\n'; --p)
  	;
        ++p;
  
--- 342,350 ----
    if (limit)
      {
        register char *p;		/* Find last newline.  */
!       /* Terminate the buffer to avoid confusing TC_EOL_IN_INSN.  */
!       *limit = '\0';
!       for (p = limit - 1; *p != '\n' || TC_EOL_IN_INSN (p); --p)
  	;
        ++p;
  
*************** input_scrub_next_buffer (char **bufp)
*** 369,375 ****
  	      return NULL;
  	    }
  
! 	  for (p = limit - 1; *p != '\n'; --p)
  	    ;
  	  ++p;
  	}
--- 370,378 ----
  	      return NULL;
  	    }
  
! 	  /* Terminate the buffer to avoid confusing TC_EOL_IN_INSN.  */
! 	  *limit = '\0';
! 	  for (p = limit - 1; *p != '\n' || TC_EOL_IN_INSN (p); --p)
  	    ;
  	  ++p;
  	}