This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we need section symbols for .shstrtab, .symtab, .strtab?

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:38:07 +0930
Subject: Re: Do we need section symbols for .shstrtab, .symtab, .strtab?
References: <20060601004053.GA17886@lucon.org> <20060601025211.GE31056@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20060601053659.GB19476@lucon.org>

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:36:59PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> I don't think it is correct.  It will skip SHN_LORESERVE/SHN_HIRESERVE
> adjustment.

Oops, yes.   I didn't intend to commit without testsuite changes
anyway.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- Do we need section symbols for .shstrtab, .symtab, .strtab?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Do we need section symbols for .shstrtab, .symtab, .strtab?
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Do we need section symbols for .shstrtab, .symtab, .strtab?
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]