This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?

From: "ddunkle (sent by Nabble.com)" <lists at nabble dot com>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
References: <1157038.post@talk.nabble.com> <20051018233153.GA492@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1157999.post@talk.nabble.com> <20051019031715.GB492@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1159068.post@talk.nabble.com>
Reply-to: ddunkle <ddunkle at arxan dot com>

It looks to me like the P term is actually computed this way:

P = run time virtual address of the section containing the relocation
    + 
    r_offset of the relocation record

This was taken from a particular O/S's dynamic relocating loader, and it makes all of the calculations work.

Does this seem correct?



--
Sent from the Gnu - Binutils - Users forum at Nabble.com:
http://www.nabble.com/how-does-ld-interpret-ELF-R_PPC_REL32--t422151.html#a1182708

Follow-Ups:
- Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
  - From: ddunkle (sent by Nabble.com)
- Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
  - From: ddunkle (sent by Nabble.com)
- Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: how does ld interpret ELF R_PPC_REL32?
  - From: ddunkle (sent by Nabble.com)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]