This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 17:53:07 +0930
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- References: <20050711180655.GN5314@systemhalted.org> <20050711190623.GP4740@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <20050711212643.GA4707@lucon.org> <20050712005740.GI30960@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20050713004712.GA27973@lucon.org> <20050713133211.GN30960@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20050713134825.GO30960@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20050714135406.GA28189@bubble.grove.modra.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508050749200.15214@wotan.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508050947070.15214@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:53:09AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> I must admit that I initially noticed the problem with HJs 2.16.91.0.2
> binutils, but I now reproduced it with clean CVS binutils.
Even now? We are back to defining these in the linker script.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre