This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
So far, no-one has given any rationalisation for the change. It wasn't posted to this list, so there's no reason given there.
Huh... didn't you see the link I posted? Here is it again: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00424.html
To my eye, the change doesn't seem right - if a section is a dependency
of .eh_frame, it needs to be kept. Needing to forcibly KEEP()
all .gcc_except_table sections should not have been necessary in the first
place.
Please read the rationale I had given for the change.
Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |