2.16.1 candidate patches

[Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:15:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I've checked this in to HEAD and the 2.16 branch.  I don't know if
> there will be a binutils 2.16.1; if no other problems turn up in the
> next month or two, probably not.  But if there is, it will include ths
> fix.

I'm putting http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00340.html
and http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00007.html plus
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00121.html on the
branch too.  The first one is important enough to roll 2.16.1 for
powerpc64 (or at least anyone using 2.16 and gcc-3.4 on powerpc64 will
want the patch).  I'm an idiot because I had a problem report in early
April but discounted it because I couldn't reproduce it, forgetting that
my local gcc-3.4 was patched to not use dot-syms.  The other two patches
just got forgotten but aren't critical in any way.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre