This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for 2.16.90 20050321 testsuite on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:07:41 +0100
- Subject: Results for 2.16.90 20050321 testsuite on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
- Reply-to: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.94.0.2-1.sparc
bison-1.875c-2.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc
kernel-2.6.11-1.1166sp1.sparc64
package kernel-devel is not installed
package kernel-smp is not installed
libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
make-3.80-5.sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 21 10:14:20 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 88
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 213
# of expected failures 31
version: 2.16.90 20050321
Platform: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc64-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
--enable-64-bit-bfd
Counting all warnings,
there are 28 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
10 libiberty/concat.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
2 include/xregex2.h
Number of warning types:
10 traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in
parameter array declarators