This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Branches in CVS repository?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: mark at codesourcery dot com
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:02:38 -0500
Subject: Re: Branches in CVS repository?
References: <200501150003.j0F03Wka006774@sirius.codesourcery.com> <m3y8evcuf6.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <41EB9645.4040409@redhat.com> <41EBEACC.3010001@codesourcery.com> <jeekgkyp3r.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <41EBEE05.8000105@codesourcery.com>

I don't have a problem with branches in src/libiberty or src/include,
provided it's understood that those branches exist for - or at least
conflict with - all the projects using those directories.  A global
naming convention would be nice.

References:
- Branches in CVS repository?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Branches in CVS repository?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Branches in CVS repository?
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Branches in CVS repository?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Branches in CVS repository?
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Branches in CVS repository?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]