This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Dec 2004 15:28:39 -0200
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty
- Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
- References: <20041219034227.GA5169@lucon.org>
On Dec 19, 2004, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> +# FIXME: libiberty doesn't support --disable-static
> +enable_static=yes
You shouldn't need this in general. AM_DISABLE_SHARED should take
care of implicitly enabling static, unless --disable-static is
actually given in the command line. If libiberty absolutely needs the
static libiberty.a, then I can see why you'd want this (but I'd at
least print a warning); otherwise, I'd just leave it alone, and if
someone configures with --disable-static, they get what they asked
for.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}