This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi H.J I got the Idea and am posting the patch for MAXQ form the mainline. You can get the sources using cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src co binutils And then apply the patch. This patch also includes all the testcases. Thanks, Inder > -----Original Message----- > From: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com > [mailto:binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of H. J. Lu > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:04 PM > To: Inderpreet Singh Baweja > Cc: ramana.r@gmail.com; binutils@sources.redhat.com > Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] MAXQ port binutils-2_15 > > I am not sure if it is a good idea to add a new port to the > release branch. I understand that the release branch is more > stable than the mainline, which also means it may be quite > different from mainline and a patch based on the release > branch may not work on mainline. On the other hand, I have > been trying to make the mainline as stable as I can. I have > been making the Linux binutils releases off the mainline, > which should be as stable as the release branch, if not > better, at least on Linux. > > > H.J. >
Attachment:
maxq-patch-mainline20041106.tar.gz
Description: maxq-patch-mainline20041106.tar.gz
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |