This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add support for OpenBSD/mips64
- From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:41:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Add support for OpenBSD/mips64
- References: <200410222156.i9MLuOcp005788@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Mark Kettenis wrote:
[snip]
> --- config.bfd 15 Oct 2004 05:47:11 -0000 1.172
> +++ config.bfd 22 Oct 2004 21:51:06 -0000
> @@ -850,6 +850,12 @@ case "${targ}" in
> targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_bigmips_vec
> targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_littlemips_vec bfd_elf64_bigmips_vec bfd_elf64_littlemips_vec"
> ;;
> +#ifdef BFD64
> + mips64*-*-openbsd*)
> + targ_defvec=bfd_elf64_tradbigmips_vec
> + targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_ntradlittlemips_vec bfd_elf32_ntradbigmips_vec bfd_elf32_tradlittlemips_vec bfd_elf32_tradbigmips_vec bfd_elf64_tradlittlemips_vec"
> + ;;
> +#endif
> mips*el-*-openbsd*)
> targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_littlemips_vec
> targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_bigmips_vec bfd_elf64_bigmips_vec bfd_elf64_littlemips_vec ecoff_little_vec ecoff_big_vec"
Is the use of *trad*mips for 64bit targets intentional? It means that
o32 ELF objects from the mips64*-*-openbsd* target are incompatible to
ones from mips*-*-openbsd*.
Thiemo