This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for 2.15.92 20041002 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Joensson <christian at j-son dot org>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:14:36 +0200
- Subject: Results for 2.15.92 20041002 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Aurora SPARC Linux release 1.92 (Tangerine FC2) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.90.0.3-6
bison-1.875-7.1
dejagnu-1.4.2-11
expect-5.39.0-96.1
gcc-3.3.4-2
glibc-2.3.3-27
glibc-2.3.3-27
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-16sparc
kernel-2.6.8-1.571sp1
tcl-8.4.5-7
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 2 06:44:18 UTC 2004
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 68
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 206
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 3
version: 2.15.92 20041002
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
Counting all warnings,
there are 24 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
4 include/fibheap.h
2 include/xregex2.h
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/hash.c
1 lex.yy.c
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 bit-field \`???' type invalid in ISO C
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
1 \`???' defined but not used
1 comparison between signed and unsigned