This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for binutils 2.15.91 20040824 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Joensson <christian at j-son dot org>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:40:49 +0200
- Subject: Results for binutils 2.15.91 20040824 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
AuroraFedora Core release 1.91 (Wombat FC2) UP UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.91.0.2-8 ftp://ftp.j-son.org/pub/aurora/wombat/binutils/
bison-1.875-7.1
dejagnu-1.4.2-11
expect-5.39.0-96.1
gcc-3.3.3-3
glibc-2.3.3-26sparc3.sparc
glibc-2.3.3-26sparc3.sparc64
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-14sparc
kernel-2.6.6-1.411sp1
tcl-8.4.5-6
zlib-1.2.1.1-2.1.sparc
zlib-1.2.1.1-2.1.sparc64
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 24 12:53:36 UTC 2004
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 68
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 205
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 3
version: binutils 2.15.91 20040824
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-64-bit-bfd
Counting all warnings,
there are 24 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
4 include/fibheap.h
2 include/xregex2.h
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/hash.c
1 lex.yy.c
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 bit-field \`???' type invalid in ISO C
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
1 \`???' defined but not used
1 comparison between signed and unsigned