This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ld -r frustration

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:58 -0700
Subject: Re: ld -r frustration
References: <20040727151103.GB15182@bubble.modra.org><1090947454.31643.9.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><87u0vtjq9p.fsf@codesourcery.com><20040729023107.GG15182@bubble.modra.org><1091091819.31643.39.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><20040729121416.GI15182@bubble.modra.org><1091106811.31643.54.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> Ah!  OK, I think I understand.  So we only coalesce sections with the
> same name, and that changes the order.  Sounds like another reason to me
> why we shouldn't be doing section coalescing during ld -r.

... which will break things that expect ld -r to do exactly that (to
repeat myself).

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- ld -r frustration
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: ld -r frustration
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]