This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64
> : DJ wrote:
> : My initial patch did just that (that's why there's a suspiciously
> : lonely looking conditional and recursion there ;)
>
> It did ? I must have missed that. It looked to me like it just
> reinvoked cons_fix_new_sparc() with sparc_no_align_cons set if
> sparc_no_align_cons was clear.
I didn't submit my first pass because it didn't work reliably.
> : but it didn't catch all the cases.
>
> Do you remember what those cases were ?
Not any more. I'll try to find time to re-debug.
- References:
- Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64
- Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64
- Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64
- Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64
- Re: gas, sparc, dwarf2, and R_SPARC_(UA)64