This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect

From: Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1087094998 dot 3b9f7a at air dot net dot au>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:49:54 +1000
Subject: Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
References: <20040610092223.A1221@mailhub.air.net.au><200406092340.i59Ne3FT028298@greed.delorie.com><20040610101446.B3128@mailhub.air.net.au><200406100214.i5A2Ew3P031152@greed.delorie.com><20040610121927.A9164@mailhub.air.net.au><200406100229.i5A2Tvv9031322@greed.delorie.com><20040610123403.A10027@mailhub.air.net.au><200406100241.i5A2fUML031527@greed.delorie.com>

> A minor argument against the change is that it's not needed yet, I'd
> think for such a major change we'd want to do the least change
> needed until the change has proven itself.  It seems to me that the
> toplevel stuff is cleanup, not prep.

OK, fair enough.  However, the src-release patch is probably required.

Ben

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]