This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Good - that is what I was hoping you would say. In which case I will apply update your patch to remove the comment as well.There is one other point. There is a comment in bfd/elf-eh-frame.c just above the patched code:
/* Note - in DWARF2 the return address column is an unsigned byte. In DWARF3 it is a ULEB128. We are following DWARF3. For most ports this will not matter as the value will be less than 128. For the others (eg FRV, SH, MMIX, IA64) they need a fixed GCC which conforms to the DWARF3 standard. */
Does this comment still apply ?
No. It should be removed. The field type (ubyte vs uleb128) is now deduced from the version number.
Cheers Nick
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |