This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > > you need.
> > >
> > > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
> >
> > Ping?
>
> Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
> holiday...)
>
> I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
> numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
> would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
> numbering schemes.
In that case, would the patch be OK without the FPA registers? I only
have actual need for the core integer registers.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer