This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
- From: Bernd Jendrissek <berndj at prism dot co dot za>
- To: Meg Abyte <fitter20 at hotmail dot com>
- Cc: ddaney at avtrex dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:13:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: FW: Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
- References: <BAY7-F976IBPUe4jahs00040332@hotmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:38:09AM -0700, Meg Abyte wrote:
> >> However, if I use Linux with the SAME equipment it can't use the
> >> DOS file. (Note: Not application specific here - it is just serial
> >> communications).
> >
> >That's what I mean. Whatever you're using to send the srec file over
> >the serial port isn't handling both line termination types, either
> >your comm software or the ROM loader at the other end. Most comm
>
> NO, that is what I meant by SAME - the same equipment (i.e. the SAME RAM or
> ROM loader on my Microprocessor board and or flash).
>
> But yes serial apps are different, but like I said then, it is a Linux
> thing - not my loader.
> Windows is Hyperterminal. Linux - is just a straight CAT and redirect to
> ttys0, OR using text file transfer in MINICOM. So it is still a linux
> issue - not the hardware, or the loader on the hardware I am using.
stty -F /dev/tts/0 -onlcr
onlcr would indeed have converted an original \015\012 into
\015\015\012.
HTH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFATA8A/FmLrNfLpjMRAqVHAJ9pmdRb3xaX3KjaCUfcMUfHJpD5VQCggxM3
cpoSUzNiUx1JVpQJHrweOGc=
=Ms0a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----