This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Assertion failure - 2.14.90.0.8 - elflink.h:4487
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Shawn Starr <shawn dot starr at rogers dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:04:41 -0800
- Subject: Re: Assertion failure - 2.14.90.0.8 - elflink.h:4487
- References: <000001c3fe87$324245f0$0200080a@PANIC>
It seems like a TLS bug. Please open a bug report with a small
testcases at
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/
H.J.
----
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:45:11AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> ./load auto-str substdio.a error.a str.a
> collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]
> /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.14.90.0.8 20040114 assertion fail
> ../../binutils-2.14.90.0.8/bfd/elflink.h:4487
>
> The above was compiling fastforward-0.51 (part of qmail).
>
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/specs
> Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
> --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --disable-checks
> --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-languages=c,c++
> --with-tls --enable-tls : (reconfigured)
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.3.4 20040229 (prerelease)
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D__GNUC__=3
> -D__GNUC_MINOR__=3 -D__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__=4 x.c -quiet -dumpbase x.c -auxbase
> x -version -o /tmp/ccWGhhfn.s
> GNU C version 3.3.4 20040229 (prerelease) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> compiled by GNU C version 3.3.4 20040227 (prerelease).
> GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=68 --param ggc-min-heapsize=72435
> ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include"
> #include "..." search starts here:
> #include <...> search starts here:
> /usr/local/include
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/include
> /usr/include
> End of search list.
> as -V -Qy -o x.o /tmp/ccWGhhfn.s
> GNU assembler version 2.14.90.0.8 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) using BFD version
> 2.14.90.0.8 20040114
>
> Is this a known issue? Your bintuils check passed without any errors (195
> passes, 1 expected failure).
>
> glibc version: 2.3.3 (CVS Feb 8th).
> Kernel 2.6.3-bk4
>
> I hope this is enough information for you. Also, do you have a mailing list
> for your binutils?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn Starr.