This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:45:54PM -0600, Christopher Bottaro wrote:Actually, there is a reason to do this. We take all of our PIC objects and put them into a libfooS.a as well as libfoo.so. This is useful if you want to link libs together or if you have specialized tools. For example, our IDE has a dietician which will calculate all the .so dependencies of a project and create small, custom shared libs only containing the needed code.
hello,
is it possible to make a shared lib (.so file) with ar? i compile all my sources with gcc and the -fPIC option, but instead of linking them together with gcc and the -shared linker flag, i just wanna use ar...is this possible?
example: gcc -c s1.c -fPIC gcc -c s2.c -fPIC gcc -c s3.c -fPIC ar crv s.so s1.o s2.o s3.o
thanks for the help.
No. Why don't you try to explain why you don't want to use gcc
-shared?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |