Re: RFA: Another MIPS multigot patch

[Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>]

Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com> writes:
> Been looking further into this assertion thing, and I think it's
> already covered by:
>
>     static bfd_vma
>     mips_elf_global_got_index [...]
>     {
>       [...]
>       BFD_ASSERT (h->dynindx >= global_got_dynindx);
>       [...]
>     }
>
> If you remove the dynindx check from check_relocs() without applying
> the rest of the patch, this assertion triggers for your test case and
> for the reduced version below.

Correction: if you apply all of the patch except for the
ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR bit.