This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Nick, This is the patch with ChangeLog and testsuite changes as requested. It's generated against the latest CVS code so i hope it'll apply easily. Please let me know if i need to change anything else. Petko On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Petko, > > > I am not sure who i need to contact so i'm sending the patch to both > > lists. > > Both lists are used by the binutils project, so sending to either one > is OK. > > > We've fixed some bugs in Maverick Crunch coprocessor opcode > > generation in gas. These fixes now allow code compiled for ep9312 > > (silicon revision D0 and D1, i.e. the latest as of now) to run > > properly on the target. The patch is generated against CVS code > > from 2004-02-05. > > Thanks for submitting this patch. Is there a document describing the > D0 and D1 revisions ? (I only have access to revision 1.0 of the > Maverick ISA description and I would like to know if there is a newer > version available). > > > Please let me know if the patch doesn't comply with the binutils > > coding standards or something needs to be redone. > > Actually the patch is fine although it was missing a couple of things: > > - a set of ChangeLog entries describing the fixes that have been > applied. > > - a patch to the gas testsuite to update the Maverick instruction > tests. > > It is also worth noting that although is covered by the obvious-change > rule and does not need a copyright assignment, if it had been any > bigger it would have needed one. > > > Sorry about the group email, but i don't know who's the official > > maintainer(s). > > The maintainers are listed in the file binutils/MAINTAINERS. Since > the Maverick is an ARM coprocessor you could have addressed this email > to either myself or Richard Earnshaw, but in any case, sending to the > list is the correct thing to do, so that everybody is kept informed. > > If you can submit a revised patch with a set of ChangeLog entries and > a fix to the gas testsuite, I will be happy to apply it. > > Cheers > Nick > > > >
Attachment:
maverick.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |