This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Binutils 2.15
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 06 Feb 2004 15:16:35 -0500
- Subject: Re: Binutils 2.15
- References: <20040129183201.GA16370@nevyn.them.org><1075415114.3351.0.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com><87fzdyl5x6.fsf@wasabisystems.com><20040129225908.GA22578@nevyn.them.org><4CE1B0CF-52C8-11D8-9562-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org><20040206162012.GA15720@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> I have taken care of this. All that remains is to link it from the web
> site, starting with something minimal like:
>
> +<H3>Bug reports</H3>
> +
> +There is a bug-tracking system at
> + <a href="http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/";>http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/</a>.
> +
Cool, there are even bugs in there. Not binutils bugs, perhaps, but
still bugs.
I think you should go ahead and put this on the binutils web page.
> Do we want bugzilla chatter to go to bug-binutils@gnu.org? I think it
> would be appropriate.
Well, we don't glibc bugzilla stuff to go to bug-binutils. That
should go to bug-glibc, I think. I know nothing about bugzilla. If
you can restrict it to stuff about binutils, then bug-binutils is
fine. If it doesn't work out for some reason, we'll create a new
list.
Does anybody object to this?
Ian