This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
- From: Ben Elliston <bje at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 06 Feb 2004 07:38:45 +1100
- Subject: Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release
- References: <87smhxiu5d.fsf@wasabisystems.com> <40229AA6.4010005@gnu.org>
Hi Andrew
> - should src/dejagnu/ be replaced?
IMHO, yes. The 1.4.4 release is very close to the version in
src/dejagnu. I've since merged a handful of patches from src -> FSF
that were missed and I've a patch that can be applied after a 1.4.4
import that will ensure that nothing will be lost from src/dejagnu.
> - should src/dejagnu/ be removed?
What would the alternative be? To just expect (ha!) developers to
have DejaGnu installed on their systems?
I think as a first step, we should go with the former. After a bit of
time, we can consider removing it from src altogether.
Cheers, Ben