This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Partial autoconf transition thoughts
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl>
- Cc: Bernd Jendrissek <berndfoobar at users dot sourceforge dot net>, Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 12 Jun 2003 18:42:28 -0300
- Subject: Re: Partial autoconf transition thoughts
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030612141547.25948F-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
On Jun 12, 2003, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> wrote:
>> What's wrong with $exec_prefix/$target_alias/lib? What "other" versions
>> of libbfd?
> That's the place for libbfd for the host
Exactly. $exec_prefix is already supposed to be host-specific, so you
don't need $host_alias there again. If you build bfd for other
targets, target_alias will be different from host_alias, and
everything is fine, each libbfd will be in a separate directory.
Unless you start building different libbfds for the same pair
(host,target), exec_prefix and target[_alias] should be enough to keep
them apart.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer