This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: arm-wince-pe-ld
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: rkeuchel at allgeier dot com
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:23:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: arm-wince-pe-ld
- References: <7252F381626D5A469006C7A8157EAEACA02E16@achb_email.allgeier.net>
Hi Rainer,
> When looking at the code, I thought that the ARM26D relocs are created
> from the ARM26 relocs when the referenced func is in the same object file.
> The ARM26D is resolved then and marked as "dead", so in pe-dll.c
> these could be ignored.
Hmm, I see your point. Please could you try out the attached patch
(based on your original submission) and let me know if it works ?
Cheers
Nick
2003-06-11 Rainer Keuchel <rkeuchel@allgeier.com>
* pe-dll.c (generate_reloc): Catch and ignore an ARM_26D
reloc.
Index: ld/pe-dll.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/pe-dll.c,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -c -3 -p -r1.57 pe-dll.c
*** ld/pe-dll.c 2 Jun 2003 08:43:37 -0000 1.57
--- ld/pe-dll.c 11 Jun 2003 16:24:16 -0000
*************** generate_reloc (abfd, info)
*** 1202,1207 ****
--- 1202,1214 ----
reloc_data[total_relocs].type = 5;
total_relocs++;
break;
+ case BITS_AND_SHIFT (24, 2):
+ if (relocs[i]->howto->type == 5)
+ /* This is an ARM_26D reloc, which is an ARM_26 reloc
+ that has already been fully processed during a
+ previous link stage, so ignore it here. */
+ break;
+ /* Fall through. */
default:
/* xgettext:c-format */
einfo (_("%XError: %d-bit reloc in dll\n"),