This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What is the blessed version of autoconf/automake?

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 22:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: What is the blessed version of autoconf/automake?

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Doug Evans wrote:
> If I generate aclocal.m4 with the aclocal from automake-000227.tar.bz2
> and then use the autoconf from autoconf-000227.tar.bz2 I get the
> above errors.

Just another me-too here.  I've signalled this issue before but
given up, so I just find+touch all aclocal.m4 after an update
and luckily hasn't had to *really* regen aclocal.m4 yet.

Wishful thinking has it that it'll all be solved with the
automake flag day that's been discussed.

brgds, H-P

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is the blessed version of autoconf/automake?
  - From: Doug Evans

References:
- What is the blessed version of autoconf/automake?
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]