This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c4x - TMS320C30-40

From: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein dot Seldal at solidas dot com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
Cc: Ralf Corsepius <corsepiu at faw dot uni-ulm dot de>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>, Binutils List <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 02:45:56 +0200
Subject: Re: c4x - TMS320C30-40
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0306042018260.63463-100000@dair.pair.com>

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:

I think I spot a misconception: the GCC target directory name
does *not* mandate the actual target name.  See xstormy16 which
lives in stormy16/.  It had a name-change after the port was
included.

Yes, we have done the same thing in respect of the c4x/tic4x target. gcc accept both versions.

(BTW, tic4x-elf *should* expand to tic4x-unknown-elf.  There
should be no need to provide a company field; if there is, it's
a bug.)

Yes, that is what I thought as well...

Then you please tell how to make sure that when the user enters ./configure --target=tic4x, he will with the wind up with the 'tic4x-unkown-coff'?

I mean, every time I try to alter config.sub to support the tic4x-elf config, it always answers 'tic4x-unknown-none'. But the BFD requires the last term to be "coff", not "none". Where can I set this default?


Regards,
Svein

Follow-Ups:
- Re: c4x - TMS320C30-40
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

References:
- Re: c4x - TMS320C30-40
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]