This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: powerpc-darwin x hppa1.1-hpux10.20 toolchain
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 27 May 2003 13:10:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: powerpc-darwin x hppa1.1-hpux10.20 toolchain
- References: <20030527200631.17503.qmail@web41112.mail.yahoo.com>
Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com> writes:
> --- amodra@bigpond.net.au wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 02:38:54AM -0700, Dara
> > Hazeghi wrote:
> > > I'm trying to build a cross-toolchain to
> > hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20.
> >
> > You can't I'm afraid. This target only builds on a
> > native host,
> > because it uses the native header files.
>
> Do you mean binutils or gcc? I thought that even
> without header files, usually cross-assembler,
> cross-linker, and cross cc1 can be built, though
> nothing else. Admittedly I don't think there is a
> cross linker in this case, but I figured building gas
> would be possible.
In this case he means binutils. For example, see bfd/som.c, which
uses header files only available on an HP host.
Nobody has done the work required to make this port host-independent.
Ian