This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:29:41PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:53:20PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:15:52PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > HJ, > > > I seem to be running into some difficulty building a usable > > > binutils 2.14.90.0.3 under debian ppc sid. While I can do > > > build which passes make check when installed the binutils is > > > broken and won't let gcc compile because... > > > > > > ldd ./libopcodes-2.14.90.0.3.so libbfd-2.14.90.0.2.so => not found > > > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0fe80000) > > > /lib/ld.so.1 => /lib/ld.so.1 (0x08000000) > > > > > > > It may be caused by > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00424.html > > > > I will look into it after I come back from gcc summit. > > > > It is caused by libtool. I will put a workaround in the Linux binutils > next week. > Here is a kludge. Please give it a try. H.J.
Attachment:
libtoo-dso.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |