This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, gdb <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 01 Apr 2003 17:20:29 +0100
- Subject: Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
- References: <ro14r5j1g87.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><3E88A369.6090403@redhat.com> <3E88AE3F.4030005@redhat.com><m3brzqzfn5.fsf@workshop.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><3E89AB79.1060700@redhat.com>
Hi Andrew,
> Unfortunatly BFD changed an interface right in the middle of this -
> it's put GDB/BFD into a death spiral :-(
Die evil GDB die ... :-)
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: get address of static_bar (timeout)
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: static variables have different addresses
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: get address of global_foo (timeout)
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: get address of global_bar (timeout)
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: global variables have different addresses
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: get address of function_foo (timeout)
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: get address of function_bar (timeout)
> FAIL: gdb.base/relocate.exp: functions have different addresses
Hmm, I currently do not see these failures. In fact I do not see any
failures running the relocate.exp script with the latest GDB and
BINUTILS sources. Have you fixed something already ?
Cheers
Nick