This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
At Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:10:15 +0000 (UTC), "J. Grant" wrote: > Due to the differing use of fp/s8 is there a reason s8 was selected as > default? In my experience s8 has been used as fp. To quote various documents i have laying about: The MIPS SysV psABI supplement (p 3-12) says: $30 s8 saved register (like s0-s7). See MIPS Run (p.23) says: 30 s8/fp Ninth register variable; subroutines that need one can use this as a frame pointer. Finally, not that they're really relevant, the n32 ABI Handbook (specifically, the page at http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi/srch3 at n32/0650/bks/SGI_Developer/books/Mpro_n32_ABI/sgi_html/ch02.html#IT02.calling-26 8-) say about that register on n32 / n64 (not that they're really relevant to o32): $30 s8 Frame pointer (if needed) Callee-saved. In other words, in my opinion: * "fp" will occasionally be correct. "s8" is always correct. and, * Even in documents that acknowledge that this register is sometimes used as a frame pointer describe it as "s8"... > I think > there might be a MIPS ABI name for fp usage, but can't remember the name. AFAICT, there is and it's "s8." 8-) cgd -- Chris Demetriou Broadcom Corporation Principal Design Engineer Broadband Processor Business Unit Any opinions expressed in this message are mine, not necessarily Broadcom's.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |