This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gas warning fixes 8

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:19:39 -0500
Subject: Re: gas warning fixes 8
References: <20021212221552.GA29106@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <3DFA011F.30603@redhat.com> <200212131745.gBDHj6B11857@envy.delorie.com>

Did you know that GCC can selectively enable unused warnings and hence not enable the useless --Wunused-param option? No need for all the attribute unused sillyness.
How would gcc tell the difference between an intentionally unused
parameter, and an accidentally unused parameter?

It doesn't. But then, GCC doesn't report an intentionally unused parameter that is being used either.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gas warning fixes 8
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- gas warning fixes 8
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: gas warning fixes 8
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: gas warning fixes 8
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]