Re: QNX binutils targets

["H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:17:05PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:13:07PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > Consider instead creating a special-named section, as proposed
> > > in <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00454.html>.
> >
> > You have no ideas what you are talking about.
> 
> Yes I do.  (Is this one of those flame wars? :-)
> 
> Please avoid sounding condescending, at least on the subject of
> a debated issue.
> 
> I'm considering compatibility with existing tools and objects
> too, which I think you're not with the ELFOSABI change.  Having

Backward compatibility is possible with the ELFOSABI change.

> > Please see
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00436.html
> 
> I did (see below); it indicates that a EI_OSABI/ELFOSABI change
> is wrong.
> 

It is wrong because the ABI is the same. In the case of QNX, the ABI
is different. Did you get it?


H.J.